| |
Major
and minor symmetry distortions
Not all of the symmetry distortions that arise during manufacturing
a diamond are accidental. In some cases, the manufacturer purposely
distorts the symmetry of the stone being cut. For example, he may
get rid of an inclusion by changing the tilt angle of a single facet.
This distorts both the shape of the adjacent facets and pointing
of the adjacent edges. In such a case, to analyze the asymmetry
on the basis of the scheme suggested, it is necessary to determine
the position of the corresponding axis, the tilt angle of each facet
with respect to this axis, and the maximum deviation of these tilt
angles. This would allow one to reveal the «minor symmetry
flaws», that is, minor distortions of the symmetry of the
diamond. Thus, each cell of the matrix discussed above should be
filled in with two figures: the first is the mutual deviation of
the axes, characterizing the «major symmetry», while
the second is the deviation of a particular facet from its position
yielding the perfect symmetry. This figure characterizes the «minor
symmetry».
When determining the parameters of a diamond facet, a single angle
is conventionally measured (for example, the angle between the facet
and the girdle plane). However, each facet is a part of a plane,
and to unambiguously define the orientation of a plane, two angles
are required, for example – the tilt angle and the azimuth.
Many symmetry distortions are due to different azimuth inclinations
of facets. For example, this can be a mutual tilt of opposite pavilion
facets. These deviations may seem insignificant since they are not
striking when the stone is examined with a loupe, but they are very
important when one performs ray-tracing for the diamond.
The method suggested describes only a portion of those phenomena
conventionally considered as symmetry distortions (for example,
it does not describe additional facets). Therefore, it must not
be used instead of the symmetry analysis methods existing so far.
However, the data being the output of our approach characterize
main symmetry distortions, both major and minor, allow one to understand
the reason of these distortions, and provide a link between the
output of a scanner, the diamond cut parameters considered by the
existing diamond grading systems, and the appearance of the diamond
whose symmetry is being analyzed. Therefore, we think that adding
the suggested matrix to a diamond certificate (a gemological conclusion
on the quality of the diamond) would inform the dealers and customers
about some important features of the diamond cut quality.
|
|