| |
The inclination of each diamond facet should be correctly defined.
In other words, a plane should be defined, relative to which the
inclination is measured. For instance let us consider a diamond
with one symmetry deviation - inclination of table plane on 1 degree.
To check whether the girdle plane is parallel to the table plane,
gemologists got used to examining the stone from the side with a
loupe. However, this way allows one to notice possible non-parallelism
only if it is strong enough. For instance, an expert equipped only
with a loupe would hardly notice a table tilt of 1 degree, as in
our example. So, the expert would grade the stone as good, in the
sense of the symmetry distortion considered. Should one put the
stone into a scanner in the table-down position, scan it, and measure
the angles in the model, the stone will appear to be bad, because
the scatter of the facet angles amounts now to 2 degrees.
Measuring the cut parameters with a Sarin machine yields a large
scatter of facet inclination angles (from 34.2 to 35.6 degrees for
the crown facets; from 40.8 to 42.6 degrees for the pavilion ones.
Due to this scatter, the existing grading systems would grade such
a stone as bad. However, the angles are actually all right, the
only problem being the inclined table. Therefore, the stone looks
quite good, shows enough brilliance and fire, and is decently graded
by the GemAdviser software. Those readers having the registered
DiamCalc product are able to work with the draft (wireframe or facet
junction) model of this stone and to check the inclination angles
for each crown and pavilion facet.
Click
here to download "TiltedTable.dmc"
The appearance of this stone strongly differs from that of stones
with all pavilion facet angles equal to 40.8 or 42.6 degrees, but
is similar to that of a stone with all pavilion facet angles equal
to 41.7 degrees. In order to obtain your own opinion you can go
to links below and to compare you visual estimations with GemAdviser
scores.
|
|